Laura Herbert’s submissions described by Mr Justice Cranston as ‘cogent and attractive’

You are here now : Great James Street > Latest News > News > Laura Herbert’s submissions described by Mr Justice Cranston as ‘cogent and attractive’

Laura Herbert’s submissions described by Mr Justice Cranston as ‘cogent and attractive’.
Acting for the appellant in a case stated at the High Court arguing to prevent extension of admissibility of res gestae evidence (999 call), distinguishing Barnaby v DPP [2015] EWHC 232 (Admin).

Read more

August 2016